The other day I replaced an old, cracked mirror in my bathroom. When I took the existing one down, suddenly the room seemed to lose half its size. Turns out it’s just a claustrophobic little room with a toilet, sink, and tub.
The sense that there’s open space in front of me while I brush my teeth is an illusion, but that illusion is much more familiar to me than the reality. In other words, my mirror-skewed impression of the room – the way it seems – feels more real and is more relevant to my life than the room’s actual properties.
The new mirror opened it up spatially again, and removed a bit of dinge and disorder from the view. This even made me seem better — I feel like a slightly more dignified person looking into an immaculate mirror than a damaged one.
The way things seem matters a lot, perhaps more than the way they actually are. You get a hint of this whenever you dress up in good clothes. Even if nobody else is around, you probably feel more capable and more formidable. Sharp attire can change, at least for the moment, who you seem to be, even though the being beneath the clothes shouldn’t be changed by draping new things on it.
Changing the way something seems, even when it doesn’t change the way it is, can have concrete downstream effects on all sorts of things. I already know I do better work when I’m better dressed, because it imparts a certain dignity to the writing process. A room made seemingly more spacious by mirrors affects the mind and mood, which affects behavior and quality of life, even how much someone would pay for the house. Plating a meal attractively makes it more enjoyable to eat, even though the tastebuds are encountering the same substances either way.
I had an interesting lesson in seemingness on my first trip to New York. Manhattan is one of my favorite places for many reasons, but one is that it was the first place I’d ever been where I felt almost no self-consciousness in public. Everybody is too busy and too world-weary to judge you. You could walk down the street in a clown costume and nobody will give you a second look. New Yorkers have seen it all, and your insignificance as an ordinary person is so much more obvious in a New York crowd than maybe anywhere else.
This felt very liberating, and it diminished my background self-consciousness permanently. It didn’t return when I got home, because a long-standing illusion had been dispelled. Most of my self-consciousness had stemmed from the subjective sense — the seemingness — that strangers are evaluating me constantly. In New York, it wasn’t possible to believe this. The indifference of the crowd was palpable. When I got home, I was able to feel that same indifference, that same basic tolerance, from the strangers here too. It no longer seemed so believable, here or anywhere, that my appearance or mannerisms were under constant scrutiny.
Persistent, unchallenged seemingness can dominate a person’s life, and make or break some of their prospects. If it seems to you that your creative work is no good, your life path will naturally veer away from creative work, reinforcing that impression. If it seems to you that you’re profoundly talented and worthy of praise, you’ll probably be more successful than you would otherwise, regardless of how talented you actually are.
How a thing is, and how it seems, are two layers of reality that can move independently, and we can take advantage of that. Psychologists sometimes talk about cognitively reframing an experience – consciously trying on different interpretations of the same event, because quite often it’s the interpretation that determines everything about the event’s impact. The body-buzz of anxiety can seem like the feeling of everything going wrong, of your complete ineptitude in the face of a challenge, or as excitement, energy, readiness for what’s about to happen. The difference consists entirely of what the anxious sensations seem to be about, because they’re the same bodily response.
This idea that seemingness often matters more than actuality, and can be managed artfully or ignored at your peril, is another example of ancient human wisdom people have mostly struggled to employ.
Famously, Hamlet acknowledged that “There is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so,” before insisting to his friends that his home country of Denmark is, for him, a prison, because it seemed so given his state of despair.
Fourteen centuries earlier, Marcus Aurelius took a more rigorous approach to the same insight. In order to avoid getting caught up in reflexive impressions – unhelpful forms of seemingness — he practiced viewing all things as plain material realities, distinct from how those things seemed to the thinking mind:
“When meat or other dainties are before you, you reflect: this is a dead fish, fowl, or pig. This Falernian is some of the juice from a bunch of grapes. My purple robe is sheep’s wool stained with a little gore from a shellfish.”
Part of Aurelius’s struggle to keep perspective as most powerful man in the world revolved around reminding himself incessantly that he’s just a guy — an aging human body wrapped in a purple robe, wearing an Imperial diadem on its head, who other men happen to regard, for the moment, as important.
We’re not all emperors, but we are all easily caught in illusory worlds of seemingness, often for the worse. Ideally, you’d want to embrace empowering impressions where you can, and drop the disempowering ones. But seemingness overlays everything; it’s hard to even see where a thing and its impressions diverge. Which is the real bathroom? The claustrophobic, mirrorless one, or the one I actually experience 99% of the time?
The Stoic exercise described above – frequently returning to the obvious material facts of a thing, and letting impressions of meaning swirl about like the fickle breezes they are – does help to temper some of the needless reactivity.
I’m operating a fast-moving road machine, among other such machines.
I’m buying plant and animal parts at the current market price.
I’m having worried thoughts about a potential upcoming challenge.
I’m a human and I’m alive.
Raw, unsensational facts like these are more dependable than any of the abstract possibilities swirling around them.
Like all perennial human dilemmas, both Western and Eastern sages have suggestions. Mindfulness practice can serve as a more formalized version of the Stoic practice: you sit and notice a feeling, a sensation, an urge, or an impression, allowing it to be there just as it appears, dropping all interpretations without fuss, noticing how quickly thoughts about it arise and dissipate. Then another thing appears and changes and dissipates, and so on. The mind begins to see, a little more clearly at least, what actually makes up life and what is fabricated by the mind.
Seemingness is hugely powerful. We live at its mercy. We’ve all had the experience of over-interpreting the punctuation or word choice in an email or text, convinced that the other person is angry because they ended with a stark period instead of a lighthearted exclamation mark or emoji. More broadly, we live under powerful impressions about what we’re destined for, what’s out of reach, whether we’re capable of cooking or algebra or career change or genuine friendship — all just seemingness. The more you can tease the two layers apart a bit, the more paths forward become possible.
***
Photos by Lin Po-Tsen, Adam Watson, Enrique Alarcon, Suhyeon Choi





I'm David, and Raptitude is a blog about getting better at being human -- things we can do to improve our lives today.
In a dark room, is a red rose black?
Very interesting! I would say the red rose is both black and red. The color then “collapses” into its final state when we turn the light on and witness it.
Great question. I didn’t expand on it in the post but in the Eastern/Buddhist view everything is reducible to present-moment experience — if you’re not experiencing redness, there’s no red. This means that there is no “is” aside from “seems” — it’s appearances all the way down. From a more materialist sort of view you might say that red is something that happens in the mind under certain conditions. You could say the rose is red because, given adequate light, an eyeball, and a brain, it creates the experience of red. Either way, red is a conditional property.
“If you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change.”
– Dr. Wayne Dyer –
One of my mantras
This is true, and it opens up the question of whether being and seeming are actually separate, and which is primary. What something “is” could be said to be a function of logically combining all the ways in which it has appeared/seemed to us. That is basically how empirical inquiry works anyway, and we don’t have any other basis for determining what things “are.” I tried not to go down the rabbit hole during this post because it would get weird fast.
On Halloween, a local artist set up a True Mirror booth — a mirror that shows you not in reverse (all other mirrors) but as others see you. Well, it’s a completely different experience! No association with company, just wanted to point out this strange cognitive effect.)
But this is only a commercial footnote on your masterful essay! So much to think about here…
https://www.truemirror.com/
Looking at yourself on a live camera, such as on a Zoom call, can also create this same effect, if you have mirroring turned off. It is disorienting because we’re used to seeing the reverse version. If you’re right handed, you’re used to seeing yourself brush your teeth as a left-hander :)
Absolutely loved the word ‘seemingness’ to describe so many of my troubles and providing succinct description of how to change my negative reception to positive one. thank you.
Beautiful. I notice that when my place is neat and simple, I feel calmer. Fewer distraction and stories I suppose. I’m part of an online zen art practice run by a buddhist monastery, and interestingly our topic for the next few weeks is “suchness” (tathata I think it’s called). It’s the idea that things have an essential nature, free of concept. So if I were to paint a ripe peach for example, I would try to express the color and juicyness- the peach as it is. Is this in tune with seemingness?
Sorry, I should have said, is this in tune with actuality, not with seemingness.
Suchness is a great word. An experience is just such as it is. The ideas and interpretations around any experience are a different phenomenon. (Although thoughts and ideas are also experiences that have their own suchness too.)
When I was a kid, I always thought mental illness had to do with a mismatch between reality and your beliefs about it. Later on, I realized this wasn’t exactly true. These days the definitions of mental illnesses usually have more to do with whether your thoughts, feelings, and perceptions cause any sort of dysfunction in your life.
Which raises a strange question: is someone deluded in their own favor, especially if those delusions have mainly positive results in their life, more mentally healthy than someone with a more accurate self perception? Is a certain degree of delusion a healthy and natural part of the human psyche, sort of like white blood cells? If so, then is “know thyself” an encouragement of self destructive behavior?
It’s a difficult balance for me. One of the things I pride myself on is a sense of realism and humility, yet I seem to accomplish much more when I’m in a state of semi-delusional confidence. I’m trying to slowly bridge the gap by bringing my actual knowledge and skills into line with my more grandiose hopes, but it can be a real struggle. I worry that sometimes you really do have to choose between believing what’s true and believing what’s good for you, and that’s not a choice I want to make.
I believe we have evolved to be biased and delusional in certain functional ways. Negativity bias is maybe the simplest example: it’s better to suffer undue alarm mistaking a stick for a snake 50 times than die mistaking a snake for a stick one time.
Although I don’t think we really choose what to believe. We can’t help but believe what seems true to us, given our priors and our instincts.
Yes, I suppose if I see it raining outside I can’t just choose to believe it’s not raining, can I?
Still, beliefs react to stimuli in fairly predictable ways, and we have a considerable degree of choice about which stimuli to expose ourselves to, especially in the internet age, so I think in an indirect way we are often forced to choose our beliefs.
I loved this entry very much. It “seems” that you are describing what I think of as the areas of perception vs. interpretation. Perception from our senses seem to be the most trustworthy/true of all: thoughts, feelings, sensations.
Thoughts can be wrong if we are misinformed, which given today’s media biases and new sense of journalism (reporters don’t need verifiable information to claim something as true, i.e. BBC report on media bias against Israel showed an enormous bias), feelings, can feel very very true, but not be correct to a situation if we believe that our younger traumatic selves create these feelings to resolve/heal a deep false belief about ourselves/ the world. So, this brings us back to to actual/ isness/ perception of what is. This chair feels hard against my back, people are walking quickly around me, I hear shouts of a teenagers voice outside my living room window where the light is streaming through, etc.
I think ultimately it is only perception that is “real life.” Interpretations, concepts, and narratives are very useful, but they begin to distort reality from the get-go. As soon as you name a perception, we’re no longer talking about the experience itself, but an abstract idea of that “type” of experience. Different experiences described using the same words make for false equivalencies, and people often use this to mislead.
Meditation is largely about attending to the direct experience and dropping the words and ideas that arise reflexively. A thing is viewed as just its appearance to the senses; it isn’t its description or implications.
This was fantastic! Thank you.
Such an impressive website.
Elevate your outerwear collection with a men’s bomber aviator jacket, designed for both style and comfort. Featuring a timeless design, it pairs effortlessly with casual and semi-casual outfits. Perfect for everyday wear, this jacket offers a sleek look with a touch of classic charm.
Comments on this entry are closed.