When you die, you appear before a studio audience and they give you a standing ovation. The host then interviews you about your great successes and misses in life.
One thing you realize, when they review the footage, is that you didn’t really try most of the time.
You thought you had tried and failed to learn a second language, to make a million dollars, to get really fit. You made an attempt or two, but in hindsight you were not in any way determined to make it happen.
Fake trying is hard to see in real time, at least in yourself, but there are hints.
Five years ago, I signed up for a 10k race when I was in no shape to run 10k. I had months to get ready, so by race day I could easily finish in less than an hour.
There were setbacks. I injured my foot, so I couldn’t train for a while. When I was about recovered, we had a brutal heatwave, which made it hard to get enthusiastic about training. Then I had a minor medical procedure, which set me back another few weeks.
Ten days out from race day, I could barely get to 5k. At this point, running 10k without stopping was impossible. So I lowered my goal: get to the halfway point without stopping, then walk. This seemed like a sensible compromise.
On race day I felt fine. I made it to the halfway point and wasn’t dying to walk, so I kept running. By mile four I knew I could finish the race without stopping, and I did.
There was nothing special going on that day. I didn’t have a great sleep, I didn’t feel inspired. I certainly hadn’t trained well. The only difference from my training runs was that, in a race setting, with spectators and timekeepers, it felt harder than usual not to actually try.
This experience made me realize (momentarily) that trying — seriously attempting a goal — is much rarer than failing. Most failures aren’t preceded by trying, but rather by reasoning yourself out of really trying.
I was reminded of this fleeting insight recently by a post from Cate Hall, who writes about discovering personal agency relatively late in life. She points out that we often don’t act like people who want to succeed:
Putting in a mediocre effort at a given task is deeply irrational if our goal is success at that task. But often, when we put in a mediocre effort, it’s because we have other covert goals we’re not really acknowledging.
She says people typically try one strategy, it doesn’t get them what they want, and then they stop. Often this is because the initial setback turns their intentions toward a conflicting goal, such as being comfortable, not being embarrassed, or not being disappointed again.
In Cate’s example, a consultant is trying to make more money. There are lots of good strategies a person could use to make this happen: raise rates for existing clients, reach more people by making more content, develop new services to offer, find a mentor to guide you, and more.
But instead, the consultant tries one strategy, it doesn’t work, and she stops, because her attention has turned to other goals:
- Not having to worry that she’s coming off as pushy
- Not releasing content that does poorly and which nobody reads
- Not acknowledging a gap in her skillset that needs to be improved
It would seem to make more sense – certainly from the perspective of a guest on the Afterlife Talk Show — to pursue a goal whose prize would outweigh all those smaller considerations (such as doubling your income) and try it for real.
To try for real means to sustain your aim on that desired outcome without flipping to a lesser, more cowardly goal when you experience some pain or frustration.
Real trying should be a trial: a prolonged experience consisting of the exact sequence of mistakes, pains, and setbacks that make success possible from where you began.
Goals usually must be achieved by gaining understandings and skills you didn’t have at the outset. You learn how to handle this or that type of interaction, how the pros really do X, and how to avoid pitfalls Y and Z. Trying means enduring the trial of learning these things, mainly by doing them in ways that don’t work. If there was no trial, either you got lucky and succeeded immediately, or you didn’t try.
To try is to undergo the trial to its end, which is either success, or a genuine, earned understanding that the prize isn’t worth what it really would cost you.
An easy way to tell if you’re really trying is to ask yourself, “How would someone who is actually determined to do this go about it?” Right away, you know whether that’s you.
When I think back about the goals I’ve failed to achieve, I seldom made a best effort and did not succeed. Much more often I decided at some point, without recognizing it, that it would be too difficult or too risky to really try. Or I’d tell myself that I will really try, only not quite yet.
Then, years later, after it didn’t happen and it doesn’t seem like it’s going to, the story in my head (or what I say to others) is that I tried and I couldn’t make it work. This is almost always untrue. Failing is common, trying is rare. But when you really do it, trying works surprisingly well.
***
This post was adapted from one originally appearing on Raptitude’s Patreon page. Patreon supporters help keep this site online, and get access to a library of extra posts and other goodies.




I'm David, and Raptitude is a blog about getting better at being human -- things we can do to improve our lives today.
{ 18 Comments }
It’s interesting because I just realized… I’m transitioning to freelance writing and for the last months I’ve been trying to get copywriting clients, when I really wanna do journalism (but pitching outlets scares me more since I want it more), reasoning being: you need at least a few copywriting clients to pay the bills since journalism is more unstable. Which, sure. But truth is, I haven’t really been trying with these copywriting clients. (to be fair I had a hand injury which slowed me BUT I haven’t tried all that many strategies)
And I wonder if it isn’t partly because well that’s not actually what I wanna do, and I spent years of my adult life already doing what I don’t really wanna do to pay the bills (aka content marketing). In the end I was supposed to transition to a great job and I’m still avoiding what I really want.
So I decided to just pursue journalism and see what happens.
Anyways, nice post!
I wish you the best with it. There are often a lot of layers going on in why we aren’t doing something.
I remember reading this when it was shared to Patrons, and I’ve really tried to apply that thinking, and put in some _real_ trying on my most-recent Quest, to be ready to do a 700k bike ride by mid-August.
There’s only 2.5 weeks left, but this is a good reminder to keep on trying, and push outside the comfort zone where needed!
Oh wow, I didn’t realize it was quite that long. I saw your update in the forum — from your plan it looks like you’ve just got a few training rides and then you’re ready? Or is there more?
I like the strategy of considering multiple ways of trying to reach the goal and asking yourself how a determined person would do it. and I recognize the types of excuses I’ve had over the years as to why I didn’t try harder (getting out of my comfort zone, risk of being a failure in front of others etc). I have a few personal and work goals that I will try this with, and might create a template document to use which asks those questions and forces me to list out the different ways that I will try to reach the goal. thanks!.
This may sound horrid as a comparison, but I’ve been thinking about the people of Ukraine recently—whom I consider heroic. They’ve held the line against Russia by doing absolutely whatever is necessary, in the process evolving their fighting ability in ways never before seen in the world (particularly wrt drones and other new technology). They’re fighting for their country and people as if there is no choice but to succeed.
David probably won’t appreciate your comment. He is very deeply in the right-wing algorithm, whining about speech suppression despite charging people over a thousand dollars to read his thoughts on patreon.
There’s a very small chance he isn’t as pro-Russia as the many Conservatives he follows on Twitter. He has unfortunately become a grifter.
I don’t have an opinion on Ukraine and I think Russia is generally bad, although I think both of your comments are pretty irrelevant.
I am a liberal at heart, which means I’m for free speech. If you don’t believe in free speech anymore, you aren’t liberal anymore, because all other liberties depend on it.
I don’t know who can deny that progressive culture has become much more authoritarian over the past decade. It’s common now among progressives to want to jail, fire, or blacklist people for their opinions (calling advocates for free speech “far right” or “nazis” for example.) I think this is a very bad development, but many good-hearted people have gone along with it because they think it’s the “liberal” thing to do.
I rarely engage with politics these days, but I followed a bunch of conservatives because they’re more liberal than today’s progressives. I’m no right-winger, but the great danger to our rights is coming from the left today. This is obvious to me, but as long as you are caught up in this illiberal movement you will not see it. I hope you are able to find your way out of it.
I value free speech too, which is exactly why I try not to conflate criticism, accountability, and government censorship/overreach.
People of all politics use their free speech to criticize others and try to hold them accountable. Conservatives did that after Charlie Kirk’s killing, with many trying to get progressives fired over speech they disliked. That’s free speech too.
The distinction is who is using the power of the state. Using the power of the state to deny people equal rights, whether by banning same-sex couples from marrying or excluding atheists from serving in public office, is authoritarian. Calling someone a Nazi isn’t remotely the same thing as advocating imprisonment for speech, and I think your comment blurred those distinctions.
Can you give me some concrete examples of what you mean? Not random people on social media (we can all find anonymous accounts saying almost anything). I mean elected officials, influencers, pundits, or prominent progressive organizations advocating jailing people simply for expressing political opinions. I don’t think the evidence supports the picture you’re describing.
By contrast, I can point to influential conservatives advocating actual reductions in people’s rights. For example, opposition to same-sex marriage, or figures like Charlie Kirk arguing women shouldn’t vote. Those are arguments for using government power to take rights away from others.
More broadly, I think you’re drawing conclusions from anecdotes and sensationalized cherry-picked situations rather than the overall evidence. The modern conservative movement has opposed equal rights for same-sex couples, rejected overwhelming scientific consensus on issues like climate change and evolution, and become increasingly accepting of conspiracy theories. That’s why I don’t find the claim that “the great danger to our rights is coming from the left today” convincing. If we’re going to make claims that broad, they should be based on the broader body of evidence, not isolated examples.
Lastly, I have to ask, do you really believe there’s been a “War on Christmas” for the past 25 years? I celebrated Christmas just fine last year. Historically, movements that warn an “other” is coming to destroy our traditions or way of life have rarely been on the right side of history. The “War on Christmas” narrative strikes me as another example of that pattern.
Thanks for reading. Keep up the great writing!
@lionel
?
It sounds like you are assuming I identify as a “conservative team” person or that I agree with everything a conservative has ever said. I don’t think like that at all.
Despite how online discourse makes it sound, there are more than two positions to have on “politics.” In reality politics is made of a thousand different issues. They are all very complex, and there are hundreds of viable positions on each one.
If you want to choose an issue to discuss with me, email me.
“Failing isn’t common, trying is” – better title no?
No I don’t agree
I definitely enjoyed reading this post. Overall, my takeaway. Life is what you make it. If you choose the excuse way. You might end up has nothing. And if you choose the fighting way despite challenges and high possibility of failing. You might end up with something. But it all begins with a decision. You are in the driver’s seat. And you can decide to do absolutely anything. Backward, forward, or remain in your current position.
How did you get so wise? I love this, I can immediately see how my explicit goal of losing 6lbs (for example) is actually competing with my unacknowledged goals of eating all the food I want in whatever quantities I want, never feeling the discomfort of not gratifying my sensory desires and feeling physically comfortable at all times. Hmm. Only when I make all the currently operating goals conscious can I begin to weigh them up!
Hi David
I used to read your articles everyday in my early 20s when nobody cared for my success and thought I would always be a nobody. They kept my motivated and gave me a good philosophy as the foundation for my adulthood. I haven’t seen your articles show up on search results until today when I was searching something about “why people don’t actually try” and this was one of the first few results in brave search. I forgot you existed and now I’m reading the comments that you’re experiencing censorship? That really sucks. Hope you are well. Will get on your email list now.
Hey welcome back Annie. I’m well, thanks. I am not being censored. I’m responding to people who have been convinced that defending free speech is a right-wing extremist position. They are confused on this point but there’s not much I can do about it except clarify my own position.
Nothing is going to change their mind. They are convinced. I used to call myself a liberal, until they moved too far to the left. So now, what I used to be, today it’s considered conservative and I get insulted and isolated from my long time friends here in the deep blue state of MA, home of Harvard. Even though my personal political standpoints haven’t changed at all! There’s no use and it’s not anyone’s fault. Some wealthy and powerful group at the top is using this tactic to make everyone turn against each other so that we are all distracted from the fact they are actively working to suck the wealth out of the hardworking citizens in USA.
I think a big reason many people don’t try is because they (we) really don’t want it, whatever it is. We have aspirational goals, see something that looks inspiring in the moment, but when it comes right down to it, we lack the interest to see it through.